Current WIPs

    • Duck, Duck, Moose Verse: a Supernatural supposed-to-be-gen fic wherein Dean becomes the guardian of a recently orphaned Adam Milligan
    • A secret 2nd thing that I still haven’t given up on despite appearances

    And some others that I’m playing with that may or may not go anywhere:

    • Built-In Dom Verse: an Assassin’s Creed supposed-to-be-pwp with Dom!Clay Kaczmarek/sub!Desmond Miles
    • A Batman bdsm verse supposed-to-be-pwp with Dom!Artemis Bana-Mighdall/sub!Jason Todd
    • An MCU and Next Avengers: Heroes of Tomorrow crossover post-Age of Ultron
    • A Batman mer AU featuring a single teen parent Jason
    • A The Scum Villain’s Self-Saving System time-travel fic centered on the original Shen Qingqiu
    • An omegaverse Batman fic featuring smol alpha!Jason and his pack of one (two? two if we’re counting him, one if not)
    • My failed attempt at Omega Jason Todd Week 2023
    • Some crossovers that I want to be a surprise :)) which means no one’ll ever find out about ’em if I end up not going through with them
  • I'm probably gonna get yelled at for saying this but sometimes something isn't a real problem in fandom, you just learned a Japanese word describing a general fandom practice and got scared and decided it meant "The Bad Ones" of that practice

  • Whenever you see someone being like "we don't mind when women enjoy or even create m/m content, we just hate fujoshis" you are being racist. If you mean "I hate the way some female fans treat gay men like fetish objects" then say that, and we can have a conversation based on that, but "fujoshi" is, I cannot stress this enough, just a word for any woman who likes M/M content, for better or worse. It may have started out as a reclaimed insult (by the way, the insult was based on "liking gay shit makes you perverted and sinful," not "please respect the humanity of gay men") but it does not make a distinction between The Good Ones and The Bad Ones. You just decided to No True Scotsman it and that the English word for that should describe The Good Ones and the Japanese word for it should describe The Bad Ones

    Same goes for the people I saw just the other day whose discord server explicitly disallowed "Yaoi" but said that M/M content was allowed. What they meant was "M/M content is allowed as long as it isn't pornographic and fetishistic." What they actually said was "M/M content is allowed, but M/M content is strictly forbidden," and expected you to understand that the Japan-Adjacent term has porn/fetish connotations while the English-language term for THE SAME THING refers to the "normal, non-perverted" version.

    It'd be like if you used the word "cartoons" to refer to all Family-Friendly animation, regardless of style or country of origin, whether it's Japanese or American or French or whatever, and used the term "anime" to refer to all animated pornography regardless of style or country of origin. There's plenty of animated pornography that isn't Japanese! There's plenty of anime that's not pornographic! But this is the sort of thing you do when you say shit like "obviously women can read stories about gay men, but NO FUJOSHIS"

  • THANK YOU

    i don’t do fandom these days—in large part because so many people can’t behave and do shit like this—but anti-asian racism AND sex negativity has surged high in original m/m comics and literature too and it’s super creepy to see coming from self-professed progressives

  • Writing Advice #?: Don’t write out accents.

    The Surface-Level Problem: It’s distracting at best, illegible at worst. 

    The following passage from Sons and Lovers has never made a whit of sense to me:

    “I ham, Walter, my lad,’ ’e says; ‘ta’e which on ’em ter’s a mind.’ An’ so I took one, an’ thanked ’im. I didn’t like ter shake it afore ’is eyes, but ’e says, ‘Tha’d better ma’e sure it’s a good un. An’ so, yer see, I knowed it was.’”

    There’s almost certainly a point to that dialogue — plot, character, theme — but I could not figure out what the words were meant to be, and gave up on the book.  At a lesser extreme, most of Quincey’s lines from Dracula (“I know I ain’t good enough to regulate the fixin’s of your little shoes”) cause American readers to sputter into laughter, which isn’t ideal for a character who is supposed to be sweet and tragic.  Accents-written-out draw attention to mechanical qualities of the text.

    Solution #1: Use indicators outside of the quote marks to describe how a character talks.  An Atlanta accent can be “drawling” and a London one “clipped”; a Princeton one can sound “stiff” and a Newark one “relaxed.”  Do they exaggerate their vowels more (North America) or their consonants more (U.K., north Africa)?  Do they sound happy, melodious, frustrated?

    The Deeper Problem: It’s ignorant at best, and classist/racist/xenophobic at worst.

    You pretty much never see authors writing out their own accents — to the person who has the accent, the words just sound like words.  It’s only when the accent is somehow “other” to the author that it gets written out.

    And the accents that we consider “other” and “wrong” (even if no one ever uses those words, the decision to deliberately misspell words still conveys it) are pretty much never the ones from wealthy and educated parts of the country.  Instead, the accents with misspelled words and awkward inflection are those from other countries, from other social classes, from other ethnicities.  If your Maine characters speak normally and your Florida characters have grammatical errors, then you have conveyed what you consider to be correct and normal speech.  We know what J.K. Rowling thinks of French-accented English, because it’s dripping off of Fleur Delacour’s every line.

    At the bizarre extreme, we see inappropriate application of North U.K. and South U.S.-isms to every uneducated and/or poor character ever to appear in fan fic.  When wanting to get across that Steve Rogers is a simple Brooklyn boy, MCU fans have him slip into “mustn’t” and “we is.”  When conveying that Robin 2.0 is raised poor in Newark, he uses “ain’t” and “y’all” and “din.”  Never mind that Iron Man is from Manhattan, or that Robin 3.0 is raised wealthy in Newark; neither of them ever gets a written-out accent.

    Solution #2: A little word choice can go a long way, and a little research can go even further.  Listen carefully to the way people talk — on the bus, in a café, on unscripted YouTube — and write down their exact word choice.  “We good” literally means the same thing as “no thank you,” but one’s a lot more formal than the other.  “Ain’t” is a perfectly good synonym for “am not,” but not everyone will use it.

    The Obscure Problem: It’s not even how people talk.

    Look at how auto-transcription software messes up speaking styles, and it’s obvious that no one pronounces every spoken sound in every word that comes out of their mouth.  Consider how Americans say “you all right?”; 99% of us actually say something like “yait?”, using tone and head tilt to convey meaning.  Politicians speak very formally; friends at bars speak very informally.

    An example: I’m from Baltimore, Maryland.  Unless I’m speaking to an American from Texas, in which case I’m from “Baltmore, Marlind.”  Unless I’m speaking to an American from Pennsylvania, in which case I’m from “Balmore, Marlin.”  If I’m speaking to a fellow Marylander, I’m of course from “Bamor.”  (If I’m speaking to a non-American, I’m of course from “Washington D.C.”)  Trying to capture every phoneme of change from moment to moment and setting to setting would be ridiculous; better just to say I inflect more when talking to people from outside my region.

    When you write out an accent, you insert yourself, the writer, as an implied listener.  You inflict your value judgments and your linguistic ear on the reader, and you take away from the story.

    Solution #3: When in doubt, just write the dialogue how you would talk.

  • There are a lot of abuse and recovery stories out there in fandom.  A lot of them are written by people who’ve never been in an abusive relationship.  That’s fine, that certainly doesn’t mean you can’t write it, especially when it’s present in canon.  Unfortunately, it does mean that a lot of people get it wrong.

    The usual abuse narrative you see in fandom is a story about absence.  The lack of safety.  The lack of freedom.  The lack of love, or of hope, or of trust.  They try to characterize the life of an abused kid, or an abused partner, based on what’s missing.  They characterize recovery based on getting things back: finding safety, discovering freedom, and slowly regaining the ability to trust—other people, the security of the world, themselves.

    That doesn’t work.  That is not how it works.

    Lives cannot be characterized by negative space.  This is a statement about writing.  It’s also a statement about life.

    You can’t write about somebody by describing what isn’t there.  Or you can, but you’ll get a strange, inverted, abstracted picture of a life, with none of the right detail.  A silhouette.  The gaps are real but they’re not the point.

    If you’re writing a story, you need to make it about the things that are there.  Don’t try to tell me about the absence of safety.  Safety is relative.  There are moments of more or less safety all throughout your character’s day.  Absolute safety doesn’t exist in anyone’s life, abusive situation or not.

    If you are trying to tell me a story about not feeling safe, then the question you need to be thinking about is, when safety is gone, what grows in the space it left behind?

    Don’t try to tell me a story about a life characterized by the lack of safety.  Tell me a story about a life defined by the presence of fear.

    What’s there in somebody’s life when their safety, their freedom, their hope and trust are all gone?  It’s not just gaps waiting to be filled when everything comes out right in the end.  It’s not just a void.

    The absence of safety is the presence of fear.  The absence of freedom is the presence of rules, the constant litany of must do this and don’t do that and a very very complicated kind of math beneath every single decision.  The lack of love feels like self-loathing.  The lack of trust translates as learning skills and strategies and skepticism, how to get what you need because you can’t be sure it’ll be there otherwise.

    You don’t draw the lack of hope by telling me how your character rarely dares to dream about having better.  You draw it by telling me all the ways your character is up to their neck in what it takes to survive this life, this now, by telling me all the plans they do have and never once in any of them mentioning the idea of getting out.


    This is of major importance when it comes to aftermath stories, too.  Your character isn’t a hollow shell to be filled with trust and affection and security.  Your character is full.  They are brimming over with coping mechanisms and certainties about the world.  They are packed with strategies and quickfire risk-reward assessments, and depending on the person it may look more calculated or more instinctual, but it’s there.  It’s always there.  You’re not filling holes or teaching your teenage/adult character basic facts of life like they’re a child.  You’re taking a human being out of one culture and trying to immerse them in another.


    People who are abused make choices.  In a world where the ‘wrong’ choice means pain and injury, they make a damn career out of figuring out and trying to make the right choice, again and again and again.  People who are abused have a framework for the world, they are not utterly baffled by everyone else, they make assumptions and fit observations together in a way that corresponds with the world they know.

    They’re not little lost children.  They’re not empty.  They’re human beings trying to live in a way that’s as natural for them as life is for anybody, and if you’re going to write abuse/recovery, you need to know that in your bones.

    Don’t tell me about gaps.  Tell me about what’s there instead.

  • image
    image

    HELP, I'M LOSING IT AGAIN, BECAUSE THIS CHAOS GREMLIN CHILD USED TO SNEAK ATTACK BATMAN BY HIDING UNDERNEATH THE BATMOBILE AND HOLDING ON WHILE IT DROVE AROUND AT LIKE 300MPH OR WHATEVER

    AND GOT SO GOOD AT IT THAT BATMAN ACCIDENTALLY TOOK HIM ALONG ON A SUPER SECRET JUSTICE LEAGUE MEETING

    PLEASE PRAY FOR BRUCE WAYNE HE HAD TO RAISE A DICK GRAYSON WHO DID THIS KIND OF THING JUST FOR FUNSIES

  • fucking bonkers to me how much ignorance and antisemitism there is among comics fans and fucking writers. we literally invented this genre you losers. you're in our fucking house and this has to be hands down one of the worst fandoms i've been in for antisemitism

  • here's a list of just some of the things i've encountered since getting into dc comics:

    • the court of owls existing in comics AND video game canon, not to mention the number of fans who are surprised when you point out that it resembles a ton of antisemitic conspiracy theories from the protocols of the elders of zion to fucking qanon
    • the way dc refuses to acknowledge that batman is jewish (not to mention the way they did it completely by accident which is its own can of worms)
    • otto schmidt. in general.
    • that time someone used their ~catholic trauma~ as an excuse to write an au where clark kent is a sexy priest and bruce wayne (who is briefly acknowledged to be jewish in the text which if you're wondering makes this worse) just casually starts attending church and worrying about his gay, gay sins like he's seriously converted to catholicism as if that's a thought process any jew i know, even one who converts to christianity, would ever follow without wrestling with the very real guilt that comes with how and whether to practice judaism considering how hard people have worked to eradicate our people and culture through murder and conversion
    • people legitimately mistaking an on-panel depiction of a character wearing a yarmulke to a funeral for a "bald spot." like i'm sorry man even setting aside what a basic thing that is to know about judaism, once again you are in our goddamn house. you should know this.
  • so who else gets irrationally afraid and embarrassed about their interests being known to people in real life

  • I call this “residual anxiety from being bullied for everything that made me even slightly unusual every day in junior high.”

  • 1 / 529
    &. magnolia theme by seyche